ปาฏิหารย์ หลวงปู่มั่น ภูริทัตโต (รวม 5 ตอน) ฟังกันยาวๆ | อัตวิสัย

ปาฏิหารย์ หลวงปู่มั่น ภูริทัตโต (รวม 5 ตอน) ฟังกันยาวๆ

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

นอกจากการดูบทความนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถดูข้อมูลที่เป็นประโยชน์อื่นๆ อีกมากมายที่เราให้ไว้ที่นี่: ดูความรู้เพิ่มเติมที่นี่

หลวงปู่มั่นปาฏิหารย์

The Atheist Experience 25.47 with Matt Dillahunty and Shannon Q

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

00:00 Intro
01:35 Mr. Warlight | New Week, Same Lack Of Preparation
06:07 MohammedNE | Spirits Exist In The Mind
18:06 Setuf(ES) | Misunderstanding The Violinist Analogy
24:56 RaulCA | Thoughts Can Be Bad…Your Point?
33:33 RobVA | Emotions Are Irrational
53:55 ACA Clips: Kenneth Presents Exhibit: A
55:54 Simo(CA) | Why Is Rape Bad Across Time?
1:08:30 TonyAK | The Road To Recovery Is A Long One…So Is This Call
1:17:59 Your Truly(CA) | The Bible Doesn’t Advocate For Sla Here We Go Again
1:23:43 EricKS | How To Be Patient With Dishonest Theists?
1:28:47 SabienTX | It’s Wrong To Judge Theists
1:33:28 Outro
SHOW NOTES
In today’s episode of the Atheist Experience, Matt Dillahunty is joined by Shannon Q
First up today is Mr. Warlight from AK who wants to question the host’s views on spirituality. Just like last week, the caller has nothing to present.
Mohammed from NE believes that spirits are not tangible, but internal conceptual projections of a person’s mind. Since we can’t tell whether those projections are actually related to the existence of spirits or just a part of a person’s imagination, how does this help us prove that spirits truly exist in reality?
Next is Setuf from Spain who doesn’t understand the point the of Violinist analogy. It’s about bodily autonomy, not consent as consent can be revoked.
Up next from California is Raul who has a question regarding free speech versus free action. As the conversation unfolds, the caller’s points begin to drift towards the advocation of thought crimes.
Next is Rob from VA who claims that emotions are irrational. Our hosts respond that emotions themselves are not necessarily either rational or irrational, but are reactions to stimuli. How we reach those emotions and handle them is what makes them and our responses either rational or otherwise.
Next up is Simo from Canada who asks why rape can be considered wrong across the past, present, and future in a subjective moral system. Isn’t it better to be able to present an evidencebased justification for why something is wrong rather than just assert “it is”?
Next is Tony from AK who is struggling to come to terms with the process of deconversion without feeling like they are betraying the church.
Up next is Your Truly from Canada who calls in to assert that the Bible doesn’t advocate for slavery when it very clearly does and has been covered ad nauseam.
Next is Eric from KS who wants advice on how to remain patient during conversations with dishonest theists. Take notes and call them out as they create new inconsistencies.
Our final caller is Sabien from TX who wants to know if it is fair to judge theists if free will does not exist?
Call the show on Sundays 4:30pm6:00pm CT: 15129919242 or use your computer 💻 http://tiny.cc/callaxp
► Don’t like commercials? Become a patron for adfree content \u0026 more: https://www.patreon.com/theatheistexperience
► Podcast versions of the show may be found at:
https://www.spreaker.com/show/theatheistexperience
► Atheist Experience merch can be found at: http://bit.ly/aenmerch
► Become a YouTube member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCprs0DXUSrefN1i8FkQkdg/join
► Join the ACA Fan Discord:
https://tiny.cc/acadiscord

WHAT IS THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE?
The Atheist Experience is a weekly callin television show in Austin, Texas geared at a nonatheist audience. The Atheist Experience is produced by the Atheist Community of Austin.
VISIT THE ACA’S OFFICIAL WEB SITE
http://www.atheistcommunity.org (The Atheist Community of Austin)
NOTES
TheAtheistExperience is the official channel of The Atheist Experience. \”The Atheist Experience\” is a trademark of the ACA.
The views and opinions expressed by hosts, guests, or callers are their own and not necessarily representative of the Atheist Community of Austin.
Opening Theme:
Shelley Segal \”Saved\” http://www.shelleysegal.com/
Limited use license by Shelley Segal
Copyright © 2011 Shelley Segal
Oh Canada:
Music By: Beta Records
Link: https://goo.gl/peHHCX
Copyright © 19972021 Atheist Community of Austin. All rights reserved.

The SECRETS To The 360 Flip

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

Lesson on how to 360 flip. Things people don’t tell you about the shape of the board when you start out. howto 360flip learning skateboarding skate

LAW2106 03

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

บรรยายสรุป LAW2106 วิชากฎหมายอาญา 1 ส่วนภูมิภาค เทอม 1 ปี 2563

[TANK EXHIBITION] Interview with Michaël Borremans

ชมวิดีโอด้านล่าง

Convex/Concave: Belgian Contemporary Art
Curated by Dirk Snauwaert and Charlotte Friling
October 31st, 2019 January 12th, 2020
Convex or concave directions – in perception, perspectives and reflections – have come to symbolize the multiple exchanges and interrelations of subjectivity. These reflections, standins for the dualism in subjectivity, symbolize the opposing tendencies of an inner self visàvis an outer world – of a gaze turned inwards in contemplation – and of an extrovert and engaging gaze turned outwards. This dualism, defining of the very conception of subjectivity or identity and of the self, is the lens through which this gathering of contemporary Belgian artists has been organized, since that dualism captures a general characteristic, not only of modernity, but also of the artistic endeavors, and singularity, of Belgian artists. In addition, the choice for this organizing principle finds echoes in the ways in which Chinese artists and intellectuals have tackled modes of representation and dominant paradigms and, in so doing, have transformed the convexconcave dialectics into playful or meditative attitudes to selfawareness.
About the Artist:
The seductive works of Michaël Borremans (b. 1963 in Belgium, where he lives and works) contain timeless images of inner drive and external force, of the latent pressures involved in being human. Behind a veil of stylistic perfection, heavily influenced by old masters such as Diego Velázquez, Francisco Goya or Édouard Manet, the artist simulates common rituals of interpretation and meaning while questioning the medium of painting itself.
Borremans’ drawings, paintings, and films present an evocative combination of solemnlooking characters, unusual closeups, and unsetting still lifes. There is a sculptural but also theatrical dimensions to his works, which are at once highly staged and ambiguous, just as his complex and openended scenes lend themselves to conflicting moodssimultaneously nostalgic, darkly comical, disturbing, and grotesque.

นอกจากการดูหัวข้อนี้แล้ว คุณยังสามารถเข้าถึงบทวิจารณ์ดีๆ อื่นๆ อีกมากมายได้ที่นี่: ดูบทความเพิ่มเติมในหมวดหมู่Economy